Peace agreement Reality and Myth between Pakistan and India

 India and Pakistan consume approximately US$ 72 and 11 billion in protection products, respectively. The GDP of each is 2.5%, while the GDP of the other is 3.4%.

In general, it has no immediate effect on the individual nation's tactical potential or capacity for various intricate details. However, it clearly affects the economic capacity of the nation. The relationship between India and Pakistan is complicated, mostly hostile, and it has its roots in a lot of political and historical events. They have a track record of missed opportunities, hostility, and distrust. Since their independence, Pakistan and India have been involved in numerous wars, border disputes, and military standoffs. They have a background marked by broken guarantees, waiting struggles, and unsettled debates.

As atomic weapons states, Pakistan and India ought to arrange "a no-war understanding" at this moment for not a great explanation.

Pakistan is regarded as the most secure non-NPT nation in terms of nuclear security. It has executed a thorough and proficient public atomic security strategy that conforms to worldwide rules and guidelines. Nuclear weapons prevent large-scale wars and promote strategic stability. Principled compromise strategies can increase the likelihood of reciprocity; change conflict into cooperation that leads to positive results; increase interactions to facilitate fewer mutually hostile narratives and reduce security expenditures.

Ever since the loss of East Pakistan and the judicial assassination of our first elected prime minister, Pakistan's story has progressed from tragic to pathetic to absurd.

Contrarily, no nation has ever reached a robust and fruitful "no-war settlement" in recent memory. This doesn't stop India and Pakistan from normalizing the conditions for working on bilateral relations, especially in improving exchange; aiming to make life easier for people on both sides of the border who are poor. The poor masses of the Subcontinent and the Kashmiris will not benefit from playing to the crowd regarding Kashmir in the current circumstances; however, reaching a principled mutual understanding could greatly assist such an endeavor. The question is: When, if not right now?

India's neighborhood policy is challenged by China's assertive military and financial power, making South Asia a different place today. As both try to find some kind of harmony between their associations with Washington and Beijing, Islamabad and New Delhi's essential analytics has been muddled by China's ascent and the related rivalry among incredible powers. Despite this, ties with China will continue to be Islamabad's top priority. Pakistan's greatest security challenges will continue to be India and the worrying situation on Pakistan's borders with an unstable Afghanistan. India has strengthened its position on nearly every Pakistani issue since becoming a "strategic partner" of the United States and other Western powers.

In addition, one of the missed opportunities can be summarized in the relationship between Pakistan and India's past. India's hardliners are impatient with Pakistan's "peace talks." Struggle, aggression, and doubt have sabotaged efforts to achieve consistency and dependability, resulting in unanswered questions, lingering problems, and a history marked by broken promises. Furthermore, India's infringement of basic liberties in Kashmir raise huge worries in regards to state brutality against minority networks.

In order to maintain its relevance with the United States, India has received a gift by default from Pakistan's involvement in Afghanistan for more than forty years. Pakistan's ongoing monetary and political emergency is formed by its imprudent rulers and civil servants into a languid misery. Ever since the loss of East Pakistan and the judicial assassination of our first elected prime minister, Pakistan's story has progressed from tragic to pathetic to absurd. I demand that Pakistan be bombed by every significant foundation and compelling group, including the public authority, military and intelligence apparatus, parliament, political pioneers, media, common administrations, and elites.

Because any unanticipated escalation between them could jeopardize world peace, India and Pakistan must both find means to peacefully resolve their disagreements. A significant amount of the hostility, hatred, and poison is, in my opinion, the result of the failure to initiate and pursue a process of peace and reconciliation. Both nations may be able to take steps toward easing tensions and reducing hostility when there is peace. They've neglected to focus on the way that they stand to benefit extraordinarily from financial availability and exchange.

The potential benefits to trade could be mind-boggling if relations between India and Pakistan become normal. If both nations took action to get rid of tariff barriers, strict visa policies, complicated procedures, and long wait times at the border, they could rise from $2 billion to $37 billion. That would provide many additional benefits; raise funds for green technologies, education, health, poverty reduction, and development. Arguments, tub-thumping nationalism, and flag-waving cannot cover the dire social, welfare, educational, and flag-waving conditions in both countries today. The number of children who are not enrolled in school in both countries as a result of poverty, inequality, and a lack of investment is one example to take into consideration.

Despite the fact that issues that are at odds have existed for a considerable amount of time, one viable option is a "No-war Arrangement between India and Pakistan." Leaders on both sides of the border must establish a national consensus in order to support the peace process and bring all stakeholders, including core constituencies, the media, and opposition parties, on board. We must pick up where we left off and work together to find common ground in order to be prudent. As a viable alternative to interminable conflict and hostility, only then will enduring peace emerge. The value of peace is incalculable. We want to focus on the advantages that harmony gives. Peace is not an unattainable objective.